Silent Compliance: Challenges of Law-Abiding Developing States under Superpower Hegemony

Abstract: This paper examines the structural difficulties encountered by developing nations that adhere strictly to international law despite being politically, economically, and militarily marginalized by global superpowers. Notwithstanding compliance with treaties, human rights standards, and sovereignty principles, these states often endure economic penalties, military coercion, and diplomatic seclusion. This research employs a multi-method approach, integrating quantitative analysis of international law compliance indexes, case studies, and interviews with officials, to elucidate the methods by which superpowers wield coercive influence. The document evaluates various strategies for augmenting the international agency of impoverished nations, including coalition building, legislative innovation, and multilateral diplomacy. Research indicates that structural reforms at the international level, along with strategic partnerships, are crucial for achieving equity in global governance.

1. Introduction:

International law ostensibly establishes an egalitarian framework that governs all governments, regardless of their size or power, through shared rules. Instruments like the United Nations Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights assume worldwide applicability. Nonetheless, the political landscape exposes a hierarchy: superpowers frequently function beyond legal limits, but law-abiding underdeveloped nations may face economic, diplomatic, or military repercussions.

This paper seeks to address three research questions:

• How do developing countries adhere to international law in practice?
• What mechanisms do superpowers use to suppress compliant smaller states?
• What strategies can developing countries adopt to enhance their international agency and resilience?

2. Literature Review

This section situates the study within major theoretical debates and empirical scholarship concerning power asymmetry, compliance, and coercion in international law.

2.1 Theoretical Frameworks

(a) Hegemonic Stability Theory

Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST), most prominently articulated by Charles P. Kindleberger in The World in Depression, 1929–1939, argues that international order depends on the leadership of a dominant power (hegemon). According to this theory:

• A hegemon supplies public goods such as stable currency systems, open markets, and security guarantees.
• Global institutions function effectively when backed by hegemonic enforcement capacity.
• In the absence of hegemonic leadership, instability and protectionism increase.

In the context of international law, HST posits that legal frameworks embody hegemonic inclinations. Although entities like the United Nations and the World Trade Organization seem impartial, their implementation frequently corresponds with the strategic goals of prevailing nations.

Critiques of HST contend that it legitimizes disproportionate influence and diminishes the agency of smaller states. Nevertheless, the theory elucidates why dominant nations can choose to adhere to or misinterpret legal responsibilities without encountering commensurate repercussions.

(b) World-Systems Theory

Developed by Immanuel Wallerstein in The Modern World-System, World-Systems Theory views the global order as structurally hierarchical:

• Core states: industrialized, financially dominant powers.
• Semi-periphery states: transitional economies.
• Periphery states: resource-dependent, economically subordinate.

In this framework, international law is embedded within capitalist world structures. Legal regimes governing trade, finance, and intellectual property often reproduce dependency by:

• Locking peripheral states into raw-material export roles.
• Constraining policy autonomy through debt and trade agreements.
• Reinforcing technological and capital monopolies.

World System Theory emphasizes structural restrictions above episodic coercion. It elucidates why adherence by peripheral governments does not inherently result in economic convergence or political parity.

(c) Compliance Theory in International Law

Compliance scholarship, including work by Judith Kelley, particularly in Monitoring Democracy, explores why states follow international rules. Key findings include:

• States comply due to reputational concerns.
• Monitoring mechanisms (election observers, treaty bodies) encourage adherence.
• Domestic institutions mediate compliance outcomes.

However, compliance theory also demonstrates that adherence does not shield states from external pressure. Smaller states may comply fully yet still face:

• Sanctions unrelated to treaty violations.
• Politically motivated investigations.
• Selective enforcement driven by geopolitical rivalry.

Thus, legal conformity does not eliminate vulnerability in an asymmetrical power system.

2.2 Developing Countries and International Law

(a) Evidence of High Compliance

Empirical research shows that many developing countries exhibit strong formal commitment to:

• Human rights treaties (e.g., the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).
• Environmental agreements such as the Paris Agreement.
• International labor conventions under the International Labour Organization.

In several cases, developing states ratify more treaties than major powers and submit periodic compliance reports more consistently. The motivations include:

• Access to development aid.
• Trade privileges.
• Normative legitimacy in global forums.

However, implementation gaps sometimes arise due to capacity limitations rather than deliberate non-compliance.

(b) Case Examples

1. Costa Rica

• Abolished its military in 1948.
• Invests heavily in education and social welfare.
• Strong adherence to human rights institutions.
• Active participant in international dispute resolution mechanisms.

Costa Rica demonstrates how normative commitment can enhance diplomatic credibility and “soft power,” despite limited military capacity.

2. Uruguay

• High compliance with international labor standards.
• Robust democratic institutions.
• Strong record of engagement with UN human rights bodies.

Uruguay illustrates how smaller economies can leverage compliance to build stable international partnerships.

3. Botswana

• Consistently ranks high in governance and rule-of-law indicators.
• Maintains relatively low corruption levels.
• Integrates international legal norms into domestic institutions.

Botswana’s case challenges assumptions that resource-rich developing states are inherently governance-deficient.

(c) Limits of Compliance

Despite these positive examples:

• Compliance does not guarantee immunity from trade pressures.
• Legal adherence does not eliminate vulnerability to financial shocks.
• Political neutrality does not prevent entanglement in major power rivalries.

The literature thus suggests a distinction between normative compliance and structural power security.

2.3 Superpower Coercion

Scholarly research documents several recurring mechanisms through which powerful states influence or constrain smaller ones.

(a) Economic Sanctions

Sanctions serve as instruments of foreign policy leverage. They may include:

• Asset freezes.
• Trade embargoes.
• Financial transaction restrictions.

Sanctions frequently function independently of multilateral agreement and can disproportionately impact smaller economies reliant on foreign trade or currency systems.

Research suggests that sanctions are occasionally enacted for geopolitical signalling rather than explicit legal infractions, prompting enquiries about selective enforcement.

(b) Military Intimidation and Proxy Conflicts

Powerful states may:

• Establish military bases.
• Conduct joint exercises signaling deterrence.
• Support proxy actors in regional disputes.

Such strategies create indirect pressure without formal declarations of war, blurring the line between lawful security policy and coercive diplomacy.

(c) Diplomatic Isolation and Selective Enforcement

Mechanisms include:

• Blocking resolutions in the United Nations Security Council.
• Withholding recognition or support in international organizations.
• Initiating legal proceedings strategically in forums like the WTO.

Selective enforcement reinforces perceptions that international law is applied asymmetrically, undermining legitimacy among peripheral states.

Synthesis of the Literature

The literature converges on three core insights:

1. International law is embedded within power structures (Hegemonic Stability and World-Systems perspectives).
2. Compliance is often rational and beneficial but not protective (Compliance Theory).
3. Coercion operates through economic, military, and institutional mechanisms, often in legally ambiguous ways.

These frameworks together support the main point of this paper: while poor countries usually follow international rules, they need to build strategic alliances and coalitions to lessen their vulnerability and increase their influence on the global stage.

3. Methodology

This study employs a mixed-methods approach:

Quantitative Analysis:

Compliance indices from UN Treaty Collection, Human Rights Measurement Initiative, and World Bank governance indicators

Statistical correlation between law adherence and exposure to sanctions or external interventions

Qualitative Case Studies:

Costa Rica: Peaceful compliance in Central America and external pressure from U.S. military interests

Botswana: Governance compliance amid regional power dynamics

Iran (post-2015 nuclear agreement): Lawful engagement yet subject to sanctions

Policy Interviews:

Interviews with diplomats, legal advisors, and NGO leaders to assess perceptions of systemic suppression

4. Analysis: This section synthesizes the theoretical and empirical discussions to identify recurring patterns of compliance, mechanisms of suppression, and lessons from selected case studies.

4.1 Patterns of Compliance

(a) Exceeding Formal Obligations

Evidence indicates that numerous developing nations not only adhere to international responsibilities but, in specific areas, surpass minimum standards. This is particularly visible in:

• Environmental protection (ambitious climate pledges, biodiversity commitments).
• Human rights reporting under treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
• Trade law adherence within the World Trade Organization framework.

Numerous smaller states constantly file treaty reports punctually, welcome monitoring visits, and incorporate international rules into domestic legislation more thoroughly than certain major countries. This pattern reflects:

1. Reputational strategy – building credibility in global forums.
2. Economic necessity – maintaining investor confidence.
3. Normative alignment – embedding international standards within constitutional systems.

(b) Transparency without Protection

However, transparency and legal conformity do not guarantee immunity from coercion. In fact, openness can sometimes increase vulnerability:

• Transparent economies are more exposed to financial sanctions.
• Rule-of-law systems are more dependent on global financial and trade networks.
• Treaty compliance does not shield states from geopolitical spillovers.

The core paradox is clear: legal compliance enhances legitimacy but does not equalize power asymmetry.

4.2 Mechanisms of Suppression

Superpower influence operates across interconnected domains—economic, military, and institutional.

(a) Economic Leverage

Economic tools are often the most immediate and effective mechanisms of coercion:

• Conditional aid and loans from institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
• Trade embargoes and targeted sanctions.
• Financial system exclusion, including restrictions on access to global banking networks.

These policies can swiftly destabilize smaller economies that depend significantly on exports, foreign direct investment, or international credit markets. Importantly, unilateral action rather than multilateral agreement may enact such policies.

(b) Military and Security Pressure

Military and strategic tools reinforce economic leverage:

• Threats of intervention.
• Arms embargoes or security assistance manipulation.
• Proxy conflicts within regional rivalries.

While often justified under security doctrines, these measures can constrain the foreign policy autonomy of smaller states and deter independent alignment choices.

(c) Legal and Diplomatic Constraints

Institutional asymmetries further entrench inequality:

• Selective invocation of international law.
• Political shielding of allies.
• Use of veto authority within the United Nations Security Council.

The permanent members the United States, China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom hold institutional advantages that enable them to obstruct enforcement efforts or influence sanction regimes.

This institutional disparity bolsters notions of biased justice.

4.3 Case Study Insights

(a) Costa Rica

Costa Rica abolished its military in 1948 and has since prioritized:

• Human rights protection.
• Environmental sustainability.
• Neutral diplomacy.

Despite its adherence to legal standards and normative leadership, Costa Rica faced pressure during Cold War regional conflicts shaped by the United States. The case illustrates that neutrality and compliance with international standards may not entirely protect minor governments from geopolitical forces.

Insight: Normative legitimacy strengthens diplomatic standing but cannot eliminate exposure to hegemonic rivalry.

(b) Botswana

Botswana is widely recognized for:

• Strong governance institutions.
• Low corruption relative to regional averages.
• Adherence to rule-of-law principles.

This adherence has reduced political instability and the risks of outsider intervention. Nevertheless, Botswana continues to rely economically on international diamond markets. Fluctuations in commodity prices and external demand cycles reveal structural vulnerabilities.

Insight: Good governance enhances resilience but does not eliminate economic dependency embedded in global market hierarchies.

(c) Iran and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

Iran’s participation in the JCPOA involved:

• Verified limitations on nuclear enrichment.
• International inspections.
• Structured compliance under multilateral agreement.

Notwithstanding compliance certification by oversight entities, unilateral sanctions—especially after the United States’ exit from the agreement—reinstated stringent economic constraints.

This case illustrates how:

• Multilateral agreements can be undermined by unilateral power.
• Legal compliance does not guarantee reciprocal adherence by stronger parties.
• Financial system dominance amplifies coercive capacity.

Insight: Systemic bias emerges when powerful states can exit agreements without proportional consequences.

Integrated Analysis

Across cases and mechanisms, three patterns emerge:

1. Compliance is rational but insufficient – It secures legitimacy but not immunity.
2. Suppression mechanisms are multidimensional – Economic, military, and institutional tools reinforce one another.
3. Structural asymmetry persists – Legal equality coexists with practical inequality.

The analysis indicates that developing nations necessitate tactics beyond mere compliance with regulations. To effectively equalize opportunities, they must integrate compliance with coalition-building, diversify alliances, and advocate for institutional transformation.

In summary, international law provides a structure for equality, but strategic partnerships are crucial for converting nominal equality into meaningful agency.

5. Discussion: The results from compliance patterns, coercive mechanisms, and case studies underscore the enduring structural disadvantages encountered by developing nations in global governance. Although international law establishes formal equality, the actual dynamics of power disparity frequently make legal adherence inadequate for safeguarding smaller governments against economic, military, or diplomatic coercion.

5.0 Core Insights

(a) Structural Disadvantage

• Power asymmetry dominates outcomes: Developing states, even when fully compliant, remain vulnerable to coercion by superpowers.
• Dependency dynamics persist: Economic reliance on global markets or foreign aid increases exposure to sanctions or conditionality.
• Limited agency in multilateral forums: Voting power, veto structures, and procedural control often favor powerful states.

Example: Despite Costa Rica’s strict adherence to international law and demilitarized status, it was still pressured by U.S. interventions during the Cold War, demonstrating that compliance alone does not neutralize geopolitical vulnerabilities.

(b) Legal Ineffectiveness

• Enforcement is contingent on political will: International courts, treaty bodies, and UN mechanisms can monitor compliance but lack independent coercive power.
• Selective application undermines legitimacy: Powerful states can avoid sanctions or reinterpret obligations while smaller states are penalized for similar behavior.
• Asymmetric consequences: Even when smaller states comply with multilateral agreements, unilateral actions by powerful states can override collective enforcement.

Example: The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Iran’s adherence to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA); yet, the United States’ unilateral departure instigated additional sanctions, highlighting the constraints of legal frameworks when enforcement relies on hegemonic consent.

(c) Strategic Implications

Given structural and legal constraints, developing countries cannot rely solely on compliance. Instead, they require multi-layered strategies that integrate legal, diplomatic, and economic measures.

5.1 Strategies for Empowerment

(a) Regional Coalition-Building

• Rationale: Collective bargaining increases negotiating leverage and creates shared security and economic support networks.
• Mechanisms: Coordinated voting in UN bodies, joint trade negotiations, and pooled financial resources.
• Examples:
  • African Union (AU): Supports collective peacekeeping, conflict mediation, and negotiation positions on trade and climate policy.
  • ASEAN: Uses regional solidarity to negotiate economic and security arrangements, balancing the influence of major powers in Southeast Asia.

Impact: Strengthens smaller states’ bargaining positions, reduces vulnerability to unilateral coercion, and fosters peer accountability.

(b) International Legal Innovation

• Rationale: Expanding the legal toolkit can counterbalance power asymmetry.
• Mechanisms:
  • Universal jurisdiction: Holding individuals accountable for crimes like genocide or war crimes, regardless of national borders.
  • Transnational courts: Independent legal fora like the International Criminal Court (ICC) that provide enforcement beyond single-state control.
  • Treaty-based enforcement: Linking sanctions or incentives directly to treaty obligations rather than unilateral discretion.

Example: The ICC has enabled smaller states to pursue legal claims against individuals in powerful states or non-state actors, providing an avenue of accountability that complements traditional diplomacy.

(c) Economic Autonomy

• Rationale: Reducing dependence on a single hegemon or financial system mitigates coercive leverage.
• Mechanisms:
  • Diversifying trade partners across multiple regions.
  • Establishing regional financial institutions like the New Development Bank.
  • Exploring digital currencies and decentralized finance to bypass single-currency dependency.

Example: Brazil and South Africa, as part of BRICS, have invested in alternative banking structures that reduce reliance on U.S.-dominated financial channels, giving them greater economic autonomy.

(d) Norm Entrepreneurship

• Rationale: Smaller states can shape international law by introducing innovative norms in emerging areas.
• Mechanisms:
  • Advocating for climate justice, digital governance, or debt relief rules in multilateral forums.
  • Leveraging moral and reputational authority to build coalitions around new norms.

Example: Costa Rica has utilised international environmental forums to advocate for biodiversity conservation and carbon neutrality standards, impacting global environmental policies disproportionately to its size.

5.2 Integrated Perspective

To summarize:

• Legal compliance alone is insufficient. Structural inequalities and selective enforcement create persistent vulnerabilities.
• Empowerment requires multi-dimensional strategies. The integration of coalition-building, creative legislative mechanisms, economic diversification, and norm entrepreneurship enables smaller states to harness their collective diplomatic and normative influence.
• Practical implication: Developing countries can transform formal equality into substantive agency by strategically deploying these tools, creating resilience against coercion, and gradually reshaping global governance norms in their favor.

In short, strategic alliances regional, legal, economic, and normative—are not optional for smaller states but essential instruments for survival and influence in a power-asymmetric world.

6. Conclusion: Developing countries that consistently uphold international law face a persistent paradox: their normative commitment does not guarantee security or influence in a system dominated by superpower interests. While compliance enhances legitimacy, reputation, and access to international institutions, it cannot fully shield smaller states from economic coercion, military pressure, or selective legal enforcement.

Superpower hegemony—manifested through veto powers, unilateral sanctions, and strategic intervention—systematically undermines the principle of legal equality, creating a structural imbalance in global governance. As seen in the cases of Costa Rica, Botswana, and Iran, even states that exceed compliance expectations can remain vulnerable to external pressures.

To address these asymmetries, the international community must pursue multi-layered reforms:

1. Institutional and enforcement reform – Strengthening impartial enforcement of treaties, enhancing the credibility of international courts, and mitigating the selective use of legal mechanisms.
2. Coalition-based advocacy – Regional and intergovernmental alliances such as the African Union, ASEAN, and BRICS can amplify the voices of smaller states in diplomatic, economic, and normative arenas.
3. Enhanced legal and economic instruments – Diversified trade partnerships, regional development banks, digital financial tools, and innovative legal frameworks (e.g., transnational courts, universal jurisdiction) empower developing countries to reduce dependency and increase bargaining power.

Only through structural reforms and strategic diplomacy combining legal, economic, and normative strategies can the promise of international law shift from formal equality to substantive protection and agency for the most vulnerable states in the global system.

In essence, strategic alliances are not merely advantageous they are essential for leveling the playing field, ensuring that developing countries can navigate the tension between normative ideals and geopolitical realities, and ultimately participate as full actors in shaping the rules of international order.

References:

1. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Shah’s Note on “Southeast Asia’s Development Dilemma: Democratic Aspirations and Modernization Realities”. 10.5281/zenodo.16465300.
2. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Shah’s Note on Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Society: Ethical, Economic, and Social Dimensions of a Technological Transformation. 01. 10.5281/zenodo.16464851.
3. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Beyond Earth: A Scientific and Strategic Examination of Space Exploration and the Mars Mission. Sci-Tech Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.16465137.
4. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). Shah’s note on the Policies for Energy and Climate Resilience: Building Clean Energy Infrastructure and Incentive Systems in Southeast Asia. 10.5281/zenodo.16547202.
5. Shah Jubaer. (2026). The Structural and Institutional Failures of Politics and Politicians in Bangladesh. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809875
6. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). LEGAL HARMONY AND TRANQUIL POLICY. 10.5281/zenodo.16657906.
7. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). Shah’s Note on “Bridging the Gaps: A Policy Framework for Integrated Behavioral Health, Substance Abuse Intervention, and Maternal Healthcare Access in Rural Communities”. 10.5281/zenodo.16622518.
8. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). From Bismarck to Beveridge: Tracing the Foundations of the Welfare State. 10.5281/zenodo.16730455.
9. Jubaer, Shah & Swarna, Sadia & Hoque, Lipa & Rofi, Syed & Siddique, Anas. (2022). Professional Ethics and Social Service in a communally connected profession: A Socio-Aid Prospective. 10.13140/RG.2.2.27084.49282.
10. Jubaer, Shah & Hassan, Muhammed & Rofi, Syed & Roy, Shuvrangshu & Ahmed, Mohammad. (2022). A BASIC SUMMARY TOWARDS COMPUTER SCIENCE: AN ATTEMPT TO GENERATE INFORMATION’S FOR THE PRACTICALITY TO READERS. 10.13140/RG.2.2.20373.60645.
11. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Swarna, Sadia & Sreya, Faria & Begum, Panna. (2022). CLINICAL APPROACH TO INFERTILE WOMEN AND THE VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF): A MEDICINAL DISCIPLINE CHRONICLES. Journal (Academy of Hospital Administration (India)). 08. 28-43. 10.17605/OSF.IO/PV6QT.
12. Jubaer, Shah & Rofi, Syed & Roy, Shuvrangshu & Numan, Md.Atiqur Rahman. (2022). THE LEGAL STRUCTURE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN TERMS OF DETERMINING TO DISCERN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: A PROPORTIONAL ASSORTMENT FOR AN EASY CONSCIOUSNESS”. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 09. 19-25. 10.17605/OSF.IO/J975Q.
13. Shah Jubaer. (2026). Philosophy for Gen-Z and Gen-Alpha: A New Conceptual Framework. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18820162
14. Jubaer, Shah & Nayeem, Md.Boktiar. (2021). THE PUBLIC JUSTICE AND FALSE EVIDENCE RELATED OFFENSES UNDER PENAL CODE, 1860: A PENAL DISCUSSION. 10.13140/RG.2.2.18171.44325.
15. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). Shah’s Note on The Doctrine of Domicile under the Private International Law. 10.13140/RG.2.2.27841.68965.
16. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Dynamics of Genius.
17. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The July Charter: Navigating Constitutional Reform Deadlocks in Bangladesh.
18. Deb, Bishal & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). THE STATUS, SOCIOLOGICAL, AND MEDICAL STANDARDS OF THE FEMALE TEA GARDEN WORKERS UNDER THE LEGAL STRUCTURE OF BANGLADESH. 10.17605/OSF.IO/V8M4F.
19. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). BASIC GUIDELINES TO COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN IDEOLOGICAL AND METHODICAL DISCUSSION. 10.17605/OSF.IO/X42KC.
20. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). Notes on the Conflict and choice of Laws. 10.13140/RG.2.2.13526.98886.
21. Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Migration, Refugee Law & Border Governance in Europe and the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809879
22. Shah Jubaer. (2026). Human Rights Protection in Crisis Situations in Developing Countries. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809820
23. Jubaer, Shah & Rofi, Syed Hasan Shahriar. (2021). “Social Identification of the homosexual partnership and globally acceptable Structure of Marriage: A Legal Construction and Clarification”. 10.13140/RG.2.2.23938.20162.
24. Jubaer, Shah & Hassan, Muhammed. (2021). THE ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY: A CRIMINOLOGIST REFLECTION. European Journal of Sociology. 2. 18-29. 10.17605/OSF.IO/RWGEJ.
25. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Role of Forensic Evidence in Securing Convictions.
26. Faruqe, Omer & Aditi, Jubaer & Jubaer, Omer & Aditi, & Jubaer, Shah & Moumi, Aditi. (2021). The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study. 10.13140/RG.2.2.21721.44645.
27. Jubaer, Shah & Nayeem, Md.Boktiar. (2021). An introduction to statutory interpretation and the role of court with common law approach of legal construction. 10.13140/RG.2.2.26073.03681.
28. Jubaer, Shah & Ahad, Mohammad & Khan, Fazle & Ahmad, Arif. (2021). Genocide, democide, psychology of terrorism, and torture under International Law: A comparative and interdisciplinary approach. 10.13140/RG.2.2.33121.43360.
29. Rumon, Abdul & Khan, Fazle & Suma, Tamanna Akther & promi, Shotorupa & Badhan, Pratim & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). Cyber Stalking is a Cybercrime or not: Hosting a new cybercrime. 10.13140/RG.2.2.28965.83681.
30. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). The Criminal Justice and Forensic Criminology: A Basic Rule. 10.13140/RG.2.2.20534.63049.
31. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). Biological and Biochemical Theories in Criminology: An earlier approach to modern application. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17270.93764.
32. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2021). The Concept of Education: A Western Rationalist Approach. International Journal of Educational Advancement. 04. 138-150. 10.31149/ijie.v4i6.1963.
33. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2021). RIGHT REALISM AND THE REALIST CRIMINOLOGY: THE AMERICAN CRIMINOLOGIST’S APPROACH. connexions • international professional communication journal | revista de comunicação profissional internacional. 07. 199-212. 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZDVWC.
34. Jubaer, Shah. (2021). THE CRIME, CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR, AND EXTENDED CRIMINOLOGY: A CRITICAL SCRUTINY. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research. 08. 213-221. 10.17605/OSF.IO/62FKZ.
35. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Bonik, Dipto & Haque, Redwanul & Sadi, Shariful. (2021). Theory of Justice and Universally acceptable equality principles. Indian Journal of Scientific Research. 09. 59-76. 10.17605/OSF.IO/M2BRW.
36. Rahman, Fayzur & Moumi, Aditi & Deb, Bishal & Hoque, Lipa & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). VICTIMLESS CRIME AND VICTIMOLOGY UNDER DIFFERENT NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM: A GLOBAL APPROACH. European Researcher. 02. 6-16. 10.17605/OSF.IO/HX5JB.
37. Jubaer, Shah & Sadek, Shah & Rahman, Shah. (2021). “THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE: A HISTORY CHANGED BY THE HISTORIANS”. 2. 2776-0995. 10.17605/OSF.IO/8NJEM.
38. Hassan, Muhammed & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE COMMON LEARNERS: A COMPARATIVE LEARNING APPROACH. 10.17605/OSF.IO/VGT24.
39. Jubaer, Shah & Saleh Ahmed, Shah & Ahmad, Arif & Sadi, Shariful. (2021). THE ISLAM, DEMOCRACY, AND SECULARISM: A CRITICAL COMPARATIVE OBSERVATION. European Journal of Podiatry / Revista Europea de Podología. 2. 82-93. 10.17605/OSF.IO/M3Z4X.
40. Mostofa, Shamsul & Deb, Bishal & Moumi, Aditi & Rahman, Fayzur & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). THE IDEA OF RIGHTS: A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE APPROACH. 02. 16-24. 10.17605/OSF.IO/FJ8GT.
41. Jubaer, Shah. (2026). When Giants Fuck the Rules: Power, Impunity, and the Crisis of International Law. Public international and private international law. 2.
42. Hassan, Muhammed & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE COMMON LEARNERS: A COMPARATIVE LEARNING APPROACH. 2.
43. Abedin, Jerin & Dash, Arpita & Shovon, Ahmed Iftekhar & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). WORK PARTICIPATION OF FEMALES AND EMERGING LABOR CIRCUMSTANCES IN BANGLADESH. 2. 1-11. 10.17605/OSF.IO/AFHY9.
44. Ridoy, Haque & Khan, Adnan & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). LEGAL CERTIFICATION AND OFFICIAL RECOGNITION PROCESS OF LANDS UNDER THE LAND LAWS OF BANGLADESH. 8. 13-18. 10.17605/OSF.IO/2TPEF.
45. Ahmed, Jayed & Jubaer, Shah. (2021). “DEFICIENCY IN EVIDENCE LAW CONCERNING TECHNOLOGICAL AND EXPERT SUPPORT”. 07. 1-10. 10.17605/OSF.IO/2UH8D.
46. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2021). The Forensic science and Forensic Criminology: A comparative narration for law practitioners. 10.13140/RG.2.2.11883.87848.
47. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2021). The global pandemic is changing international business strategies in relation to different sectors. International Journal of Value-Based Management. January. 13.
48. Jubaer, Shah. (2020). “An Effective association between the Constitution and Constitutionalism to set up a Constitutional Government”. 10.13140/RG.2.2.29073.97126.
49. Jubaer, Shah. (2020). Comparative Constitutional Law.
50. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Bonik, Dipto & Deb, Bishal & Sadi, Shariful. (2020). The Racism and discrimination in Bangladesh: A Comparative global outline. 10.13140/RG.2.2.13974.47687.
51. Jubaer, Shah. (2020). Conceivable New Unit of Comparative Law : A Comparative Application. 10.13140/RG.2.2.32062.41288.
52. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Bonik, Dipto. (2020). Jurisdiction and the Law of Jurisdiction in International Law. 10.13140/RG.2.2.10089.83043.
53. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). Ideological manifestation of Socialism: Andrew Heywood observation.
54. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). The pragmatic morality and principle of Natural Justice: A negative legal construction.
55. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Bashar Oyes, Imrul & Rahman, Fayzur & Sadi, Shariful. (2019). The Concept of Social Inclusion and Exclusion: A Legal Observation. 10.13140/RG.2.2.12652.28802.
56. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). The method of findings the Criminal Intention and the consequential outcome of a crime: A basic Guideline towards criminal law practitioners.
57. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). A conceptual introduction of Crime: Systematic observations.. 10.13140/RG.2.2.21779.81443.
58. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa & Deb, Bishal & Khan, Adnan & Moumi, Aditi. (2019). “Religion and the Philosophy of Religion: A positivist observation”. Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review. 10.13140/RG.2.2.32901.27363.
59. Jubaer, Shah & Bashar Oyes, Imrul & Sadi, Shariful & Hoque, Lipa. (2019). The Social Exclusion and Social Theory: A Comparative Approach. 03. 26-40.
60. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). Governance and Good Governance. 10.13140/RG.2.2.28706.96963.
61. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2019). The Democracy or a system of elected representation: Analytical affinities and trivialities.
62. Hoque, Lipa & Jubaer, Shah & Jubaer, Shah. (2019). Human Rights and the worldwide policy framework: An analytical approach. The International Journal of Human Rights.
63. Jubaer, Shah. (2019). Child Development Theories and Application.
64. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). The rationalization theme, action and Bureaucracy in Socialism.
65. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). A Plain and sample narration of the Criminology. Criminal Justice Review.
66. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). The specific performance and specific Relief Act.
67. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). A formalistic necessity of the Rule of Law: Comparative Analogy.
68. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). Research Methodology: An Introduction. 10.13140/RG.2.2.12768.61447.
69. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). Public Interest Litigation and availability of justice in Bangladesh: A legal overview.
70. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). Natural Justice and duty to act fairly under Administrative Law: A comparative discussion.
71. Deb, Bishal & Jubaer, Shah. (2018). A formalistic necessity of the Rule of Law: Comparative Analogy.
72. Jubaer, Shah. (2018). A basic guidelines to apply Human Rights: comparative approach under comparative constitutional law..
73. Jubaer, Shah & Hoque, Lipa. (2017). Modern Concept of the Rule of Law: A Comparative approach. 10.13140/RG.2.2.30804.12161.
74. Jubaer, Shah. (2016). “Principles of International Labour Laws adopted in Labour Law of Bangladesh”.. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15907.78883.
75. Jubaer, Shah. (2016). The ideological Elements and methodical Structure of the constitution of Bangladesh.
76. Jubaer, Shah. (2016). Applicable and inappropriate statutory Principles used of the Constitutional interpretation in Southeast Asia..
77. Jubaer, Shah. (2015). Argument to Legal decisions in terms of establishing criminal justice under the criminal court system of Bangladesh. Criminal law bulletin.
78. Jubaer, Shah. (2014). The socialist legal system: A Development process to democratic centralism.
79. Jubaer, Shah. (2024). The Strength of BNP’s Unity under Tarique Rahman’s Leadership and the Seeds of the July Revolution. Intellectica Revue de l Association pour la Recherche Cognitive. 10.5281/zenodo.16899135.
80. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s ideological views and his contributions to legal and social‑justice reform in Bangladesh.
81.   Jubaer, Shah. (2024). Diversity and Representation in Newsrooms: A Critical Pillar for Fair Reporting. 10.5281/zenodo.16891484.
82. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy. 10.5281/zenodo.17585111.
83. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Balancing National Security and Individual Rights: A Comparative Study of Data Privacy Laws. 10.5281/zenodo.17102885.
84.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Proportional Representation an electoral Fragility in Bangladesh and Asia.
85. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism in Crisis: Analyzing the Erosion of Democratic Norms in Comparative Perspective. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. 10.5281/zenodo.17118031.
86.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Corruption, Accountability, and Legal Enforcement: Evaluating Anti- Corruption Mechanisms. Asian Migrant. 10.5281/zenodo.16956144.
87.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Regulating Autonomous Systems in the Age of Digital Governance. 10.5281/zenodo.17095910.
88.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). The Evolution of Cybersecurity Law: Global Approaches to Combating Cybercrime. Artium Quaestiones. 10.5281/zenodo.17095926.
89. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Democracy and Capitalism: Negotiating Political Freedom and Economic Power in the 21st Century. Capitalism and Society. 10.5281/zenodo.17308850.
90.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Digital Transformation in the Justice System: E-Courts, Case Management, and Legal Accessibility. The Court Historian. 10.5281/zenodo.17127616.
91. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Nationalism and Globalization: Reconciling Sovereignty with Transnational Norms. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. 10.5281/zenodo.17330079.
92. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Reimagining Democracy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Participatory Governance and Institutional Accountability. 10.5281/zenodo.17363785.
93.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Public Trust Doctrine and the Legal System: Protecting Public Resources Through Law. 10.5281/ZENODO.17353820.
94. Jubaer, S. M. O. F., Hoque, L., & Banik, D. Jurisdiction and the Law of Jurisdiction in International Law.
95.   Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Shah Jubaer’s Adaptive Governance Theory. 10.5281/zenodo.17388215.
96. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism as a Moral Project: Between Legal Authority and Political Obligation. Journal du Conseil – Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer. 10.5281/zenodo.17585169.
97. Jubaer, Shah. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (30th) on Bangladesh’s Tech and Energy Future. 10.5281/zenodo.17654960.

• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (29th) on Waterway Governance and Climate Adaptation in Bangladesh. 10.5281/zenodo.17654929.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (27th) on Ensuring Fair Prices Through Farmer Protection in Bangladesh. 10.5281/zenodo.17654832.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). BNP’s Policy Reform Agenda (31st) on Modern Housing and Urbanization in Bangladesh. 10.5281/zenodo.17655008.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). BNP’S Policy Reform Agenda (28th) on Modernization of Transport and Multimodal Connectivity in Bangladesh. 10.5281/zenodo.17654881.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). The Role of Bureaucracy and Expertise in Shaping National Policy Agendas. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.17677427.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). ‘Bangladesh First Principle’: Tarique Rahman’s Political Governance Philosophy. Intellect XXІ.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). A Policy Study of Tarique Rahman’s Curriculum Vision for Bangladesh. 10.5281/zenodo.17509243.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Tarique Rahman’s Agricultural Development Theory: Empowering Farmers through the Farmer’s Card. 10.5281/zenodo.17518189.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Dynamics of Policy Formulation: How Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Shape State Policies. 10.5281/zenodo.18407161.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). The Role of Bureaucracy and Expertise in Shaping National Policy Agendas. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.17677427.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Rationality vs. Politics in National Policy Design: Analyzing the Decision-Making Process. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.18436778.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Learning from Failure: A Study on Why Certain National Policies Do Not Achieve Their Objectives. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.18444368.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Evidence-Based Policy-Making. 10.5281/zenodo.18462962.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 10th Reform Agenda. 10.5281/zenodo.18475403.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationationalist Party: 13th Reform Agenda.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Theory on Human Rights-Based Environmental Law. 10.5281/zenodo.18511651.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Populism-Law Reconciliation Theory (PLRT). EUREKA METHODS. 10.5281/zenodo.18511594.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutionalism and the Nature of the Rule of Law: From Formal Legality to Moral Legitimacy. 10.5281/zenodo.17585111.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2025). Constitutional Identity and the Limits of Constitutional Change. 10.5281/zenodo.17451483.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Human Rights and Legal Protections: Balancing State Authority and Individual Freedoms. Human Rights Law Review. 10.5281/zenodo.18518046.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Confucianism, Hindu Nationalism, and Islamism: Comparative Political Ideologies in Contemporary Asian States. Chinese Studies in History. 10.5281/zenodo.18559833.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Between Tradition and Modernity: The Evolution of Political Ideologies in East and South Asia. Revue internationale de philosophie.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 11th Reform Agenda. 10.5281/zenodo.18560812.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party:12th Reform Agenda. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Principle of Ethical-Algorithmic Governance (SJ-PEAG). 10.5281/zenodo.18676422.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 14th Reform Agenda. 10.5281/zenodo.18718260.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 15th Reform Agenda. POLICY RESEARCH. 10.5281/zenodo.18718329.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Constitutionalism Without a Constitution: The Philosophy of Unwritten Orders. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. 10.5281/zenodo.18728179.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). Temporal Constitutionalism: Mediating Past, Present, and Future in Constitutional Orders. CONSTITUO Journal of State and Political Law Research. 10.5281/zenodo.18728231.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Ethics of Constitutional Interpretation: Between Original Meaning and Living Constitutionalism. Constitution Journal.
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). The Idea of a Constitution: Ontology and Normativity in Constitutional Philosophy. Constitution Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.18736459.
• Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). The July Charter: Navigating Constitutional Reform Deadlocks in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18736538
• Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). The Dynamics of Genius. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18736653
• Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). The Role of Forensic Evidence in Securing Convictions. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18750587
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). Bangladesh Nationalist Party: 16th Reform Agenda. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18764384
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). The Sovereignty Paradox: Reconciling Popular Sovereignty with Constitutional Constraint. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18764533
• Jubaer, Shah. (2026). What is Law?. Law Journal. 10.5281/zenodo.18778395.
• Jubaer, S. M. O. F. (2026). Digital Governance & Regulation of AI in the Gen-Z Era. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18778473
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). Judicial Independence and Court Reform in the Modern Era. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795323
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). Democratic Backsliding & Constitutional Erosion in Bangladesh. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795233
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18793415
• Shah Jubaer. (2026). Shah Jubaer’s Theory of Contextual Democracy (Patent). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18793249